Topical Issues of an Expert Report in the Process of Proving in a Criminal Examination
Bryanskaya Elena1, FayzievShokhrud2, Altunina Anna3, MatiukhaAlena4
1Bryanskaya Elena, PhD in law, associate professor at the department of criminal procedure of the faculty of law of the Russian state pedagogical university named after A. I. Herzen, St Petersburg, Russia.
2Fayziev Shokhrud, Doctor of law, associate professor, editor at tadqiqot.uz, Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan.
3Altunina Anna, 2nd year student of the master’s degree courses at the law institute of Irkutsk state university, Russia.
4Matiukha Alena, Moscow region chamber of lawyers, lawyer office № 2786, advocate, member of the guild of Russian lawyers, post-graduate student of the department of criminal procedure law in Kutafin Moscow state law university, Russia.
Manuscript received on September 13, 2019. | Revised Manuscript received on October 20, 2019. | Manuscript published on October 30, 2019. | PP: 5345-5349 | Volume-9 Issue-1, October 2019 | Retrieval Number: A2946109119/2019©BEIESP | DOI: 10.35940/ijeat.A2946.109119
Open Access | Ethics and Policies | Cite | Mendeley
© The Authors. Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication (BEIESP). This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Abstract: This study presents material on an expert report as an independent source of evidence indicative that the examination of evidence is a separate stage in the process of proving. The paper includes examples from investigative and judicial practice and analysis of breaches that occur during the commissioning and performance of forensic examinations. We consider the problem of assessing the reliability of the expert’s conclusions and the methods involved in the examination. Criteria are identified on the basis of which the investigator or the court can assess the reliability of an expert report.
Keywords: Evidence examination, forensic examination, forensic expert report, expert methods, reliability of conclusions, psychological examination.