Research on Budgeting
Santhosh1, R Ranjitha Devi2, Indumathi C3, Suresh L4, S. Praveen Kumar5
1Santhosh, Student, Department of Management Studies, BIHER, Chennai (Tamil Nadu), India.
2R Ranjitha Devi, Student, Department of Management Studies, BIHER, Chennai (Tamil Nadu), India.
3Indumathi C, Student, Department of Management Studies, BIHER, Chennai (Tamil Nadu), India.
4Suresh L, Student, Department of Management Studies, BIHER, Chennai (Tamil Nadu), India.
5Dr. S. Praveen Kumar, Director, Department of Management Studies, BIHER, Chennai (Tamil Nadu), India.
Manuscript received on 29 May 2019 | Revised Manuscript received on 11 June 2019 | Manuscript Published on 22 June 2019 | PP: 727-732 | Volume-8 Issue-3S, February 2019 | Retrieval Number: C11550283S19/19©BEIESP
Open Access | Editorial and Publishing Policies | Cite | Mendeley | Indexing and Abstracting
© The Authors. Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication (BEIESP). This is an open access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Abstract: Budgeting is one of the foremost extensively researched topics in management accounting and has been studied from the theoretical views of financial science, psychology, and social science. In the preliminary part of this chapter we have a propensity to investigate budgeting analysis in those three theoretical perspectives, specializing in necessary similarities and variations across views with relation to the first analysis question, stages of take a look at, assumptions concerning rationality and equilibrium, budgeting and non-budgeting variables, and causal-model bureaucracy. Within the last part of this bankruptcy we have a propensity to establish 4 reticulated criteria for selective integrative analysis and supply partner example of exploitation these standards for evaluation on participative budgeting.
Keywords: Budgeting Social science Theoretical Model.
Scope of the Article: Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics