An Expert-Approved R&D Model
Zeeshan Asim1, Tan Seng Teck2, Shahryar Sorooshian3
1Zeeshan Asim, Faculty of Industrial Management, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Pahang, Malaysia.
2Tan Seng Teck, Faculty of Business Communication and Law, INTI International University, Nilai, Malaysia.
3Shahryar Sorooshain, ERAS, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Pahang, Malaysia.
Manuscript received on July 20, 2019. | Revised Manuscript received on August 10, 2019. | Manuscript published on August 30, 2019. | PP: 1939-1946 | Volume-8 Issue-6, August 2019. | Retrieval Number: F7927088619/2019©BEIESP | DOI: 10.35940/ijeat.F7927.088619
Open Access | Ethics and Policies | Cite | Mendeley
© The Authors. Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication (BEIESP). This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Abstract: The initial intention of this descriptive analysis is to confine closer encounter regarding the potential impact of supporting management discipline on R&D in public organization among developing countries. In this, context prior theories on R&D in Public organizations draw some conceptual models with limited narratives on how to manage supporting management discipline. Some prior studies draw capabilities prospective related to knowledge, innovation and technology management as supporting management discipline that shares their boundaries with R&D under individual context. Based on their relationship this study developed a conceptual framework to draw significance of supporting management discipline on R&D that has been long been striving to convene capability prospective among developing countries. The author analysis based on R&D fit to the context of public organization and portrays case of Pakistan under Focus Group Discussion. The experts from 81 R&D of public organizations were involved; where 195 participants are, compose into 41 Focus Groups. The outcome of Focus Group Discussion shows that process, infrastructure and strategic are consider as potential criteria’s that draw relationship among capabilities related knowledge, innovation and technology management disciplines.
Keywords: R&D, Knowledge Management, Technology Management, Innovation Management.